connie4235

(2012-04-28 06:55:34)

love this show

I think this show is better than Ghost Hunters. They have such moredetails for the places they check out. They keep the same guys all thetime, we like that. All 3 guys are great and Aaron is fun to watch. Myhusband and I are fans of the show. You also get instant satisfaction,they show you there findings as they find them. There is no loud musicplaying. Ghost Hunters does this and it is irritating. I recommend youwatch an episode or two if you are into this paranormal stuff and givethe show a chance. This may be considered a spoiler: one episode theydid bring a female in for a short time as bait, it was funny when Zaksaid to the Ghosts, they are sending her in alone and the Ghosts can dowhatever they want to her. They do not have extra camera men etc, sowhen they say they are alone they are. I have had several experienceswith entities myself and my family. When they talk to so many peopleand you hear them talk of there experiences it is very interesting tome. They interview old employees of the place they go to and set it upbefore they go. I am amazed at what went on in so many of these hauntedplaces around this country. I try to keep track of where they go, Iwould like to visit some of these towns, or hotels etc. There are manythough I would be to afraid to go to after watching them.

Laurie Z

(2012-04-27 16:08:09)

They almost had me!!!

Well, I'll admit it, I fell for it the first 2 episodes and wasthrilled over this show. I thought Zak was okay I didn't mind him butdid think that he was over re-acting to things, only to find out on thethird episode (the asylum) that he was over acting not re-acting andwas a bit bummed out. However, all is not lost, this show is stillentertaining and a bit scary even though it's fake. I realized afterthat so called hand try to grab him (lol) that this was NOT real andthat what they found at the Sloss Boiler was in fact faked and wasdisappointed. I really like the cast, Aaron and Nick are cool guys andif Zak takes it down a notch with the over acting then he's not bad towatch either.Well, it's still a good show to watch but it's no better than MostHaunted and Ghost Hunters as far as reality goes....staged, faked, etc.but definitely one of the best.

yllomsekao

(2012-04-27 10:17:04)

Everything you want and more

I've seen a lot of ghost shows, and this is by FAR the best. It's rawand entertaining. It's funny and they don't waste time showing you themreview the evidence or talk about their social problems. Another thingI love about this is that they show you the evidence as it happens.They have way cooler devices like the spirit box (something that ghostscan use to say things). Whenever I watch the intro, I can't help butsmile at how goofy it is. Although the intro isn't trying to be funny,the show has a sense of humor. Them messing around and making Aaron goto the scariest place by himself every episode really makes it. All andall, it's a really great show that any ghost enthusiast can appreciate(and one of my favorites!).

ebopper

(2012-04-27 02:46:41)

Best show ever!

1st to comment! Best show ever! I love everything about it.. 100% real,nothing faked hear like other shows... Zak is great! There is threepeople that go out and investigate actual haunted spots. Zak, Nick andAaron. They always seem to capture something. My favorite is the pilotepisode which a actual block gets thrown at them. They review the tapeand you can clearly see that there is no string, no hands, no trickery,just a block flying at them with force from a evil entity. This istruly my favorite show. I cannot wait for Friday nights on the TravelChannel. These 3 individuals do not use a camera crew and are onlysupplied with their own personal cameras and equipment. They then dohistory on the haunted places and lock themselves in with actual locksfor the entire night. Very creepy yet very entertaining. This showmakes me believe again! I recommend it 100%

wardkristen87

(2012-04-23 03:10:50)

Why bother debunking?

This show is very good when you need a really big laugh. These castfreak over everything they hear or see. Last night i watched this showand could not stop laughing. I thought Zak Nick and Aaron were way toserious. It seemed every noise they heard they thought it wasparanormal. I've watched ghost hunters and they seemed moreprofessional and they are very good at debunking. This show is horribleat debunking and being professional, like i said last night i watchedit they thought this noise was a moaning and clearly it was an owl. Zakand his crew need to calm down.They can make you laugh and smile, butthey will not scare you.overall I gave this 5 stars because it wasentering funny not scary and exciting.

eacovelli

(2012-04-22 16:14:30)

Ahhhmazing show!

This show is incredible! It is by far one of the more believable onesthat are on TV and it makes you feel like you are there when they dothe interviews! It is easy to keep up with and the three guys areabsolutely hilarious! Every Friday night me and a group of friends goesout of the way in order to watch this show, we have a big party and wealways are just speechless at the end of the show! The guy in charge,Zak Bagans, is just really real and good at this he found what he wasmeant to do and he does it well! Nick Groff is the one who is able totake a step back and keep things in a clear picture for the audience!Aaron Goodwin is good because you know it is real by the way he reacts!The three of these guys have the most amazing chemistry and it makesfor an enjoyable show! If you haven't seen it you have to watch it andif you have you understand exactly what i am saying!!

janettm

(2012-04-14 15:19:15)

Can't stand watching them too long

The title sums it all up: Three guys go on to experience ghostadventures. That said, let's talk about their methods. They get lockedinto a haunted site, set their cameras up in places where they expectsomething to happen and then roam the building for the rest of thenight. More often than not they actually catch something. Most of thetime it's "voices" that they categorize "unexplained". Sometimesthey're lucky and catch some video, too. Their methods don't seem to betoo professional. Especially the main guy annoys me a lot, because he'salways screaming around. You would think that a ghost also hears youwhen you speak in a normal voice. Most of their findings are "weirdfeelings" which have no scientific reason at all, if you ask me. Theyalways show you wishy-washy footage and claim it's paranormal, when inreality you hardly see anything. Well, I only watch this show because Iguess they have to be lucky sometime and catch something that can betaken as real proof. But really, after all is said and done, this isjust 45min of some guys running around with a camera and yelling andfeeling very important.

john_kathman

(2012-04-13 21:15:51)

sigh...

If you watch this show and actually believe the s#!t they shovel intoyour brains, I feel sorry for you. First of all, ghosts are not real.Second, these "dude-bros" don't care about actual paranormal activitywhatsoever. Can you not sense the sarcasm in their voices? This is justa money making scheme and it's foolish fans of this garbage that helpthem continue to produce their waste. The only reason I find this showentertaining is because of it's comedic value. How often do you havefrat daddies toting around "paramormal equipment" and sharing their"knowledge" of ghosts? How do they run in those birkenstocks? Why arethey running? And from what? I wonder if they get paid in kegs ofNatural Delight.

Pandaloonie

(2012-04-06 10:34:34)

I freaking LOVE these guys!!! ::Happy Hearts Day spoiler::

I have to admit it - me, a long time "yeah, right, uh huh, whatever"gal loves these guys! Just don't tell my husband. Please.reeseslightning pretty much encapsulated the basic constructs of theirpersonalities. Their shear exuberance can be annoying at times but atleast they are limited in their annoyances. No huge long camera crews,no scipts, it is as it is and, oddly enough, GH is trying hard toemulate that.I admit I was a hardcore GH fan until I stumbled on this crew. I thinkI found their original episode by accident and since then I have beenhooked. Long live the GA crew!!!! They are funny, fun, scary and oddlyinformative. None of the internal histrionics that the GH crew had, nocrew changes (national versus internal - who the hell cares?) Justthree good ole boys, doing what they do. And I have to admit it, Iloved the Valentine's Day episodes too. Talk about look for love in allthe strange places. ::hahahaha::

harfordamanda

(2012-04-05 20:43:21)

Freakin' addicting!!!

If Ghost Adventures had their own church, I would be there every Sundayand Wednesday service and more than likely every single pie pickin bakesale!! This show ROCKS!!!! Premise is simple: 12 hours, one hauntedplace and 3 tubular dudes with video cameras who are locked in fromdusk till dawn (sweet movie.) It can't get any better. Personally, Idon't doubt them one bit. Their not there to prove a haunting ordismiss it, they're just their to capture the legends on film. Thelocations are credible, you've probably even seen them on otherparanormal shows which even makes them more credible! As for theirevidence, they break it down immediately after it happens sometimesplaying it over a few times or at a slower pace and if they catchanything really spooky like a full apparition, it's analyzed to deathbecause ultimately that's the main goal is to show you that what theyget is REAL. It's also nice to have just 3 regular normal guysinteracting with you through the show than a bunch of pocket protectorscientists whom you can't even understand. Zak, Nick and Aaron are justlike you which makes the series even better. They do the exact samething my friends and I do on the weekends and it's so awesome to knowthat we're not the only ones who do that crazy crap!! I love them,can't get enough of them and hope it's on air forever!!

LAmitch

(2012-03-27 22:03:50)

It is mostly boring and silly, but Zak is easy on the eyes

IMDb puts this program in the categories History / Sci-Fi / Thriller.My satellite TV guide refers to it as Paranormal Series. I wouldcategorize it as Sci-Fi / Supernatural / Sad attempt at Thriller. Inthe name of full disclosure, I've never seen a fake reality show ormovie that I liked, horror shows are not often my favoriteentertainment, but I occasionally do like horror films. I frequentlylike history, documentaries, Sci-Fi, science, and supernatural shows. I do give Ghost Adventures a bit of a pass because it is categorized asSci-Fi and Paranormal; by definition that means it is fictional, andoutside our human understanding of the natural world. On the up side, Ican see how some might be entertained by the silly antics the host, ZakBagans, and his team (Zak is handsome and has a great body, but wouldbe better looking if he'd just stop talking). I mean the guys seem tobelieve that every creaking board is a ghost, and every breeze is ademon. They also seems to think they can intimidate supernaturalentities by yelling at them, and calling them names. To see grown menacting like that is quite humorous, and intentionally so, because ifgrown men did actually believe that silliness, it would be just too sadto bear.The down side of Ghost Adventures is that it is filmed in the RealityTV style, and the guys are either fooling themselves or attempting tofool their audience into thinking they are collecting "evidence ofparanormal activity." As I've written in other program reviews, whenpeople mix Reality TV with Supernatural, the only possible outcomes aresilly humor, or significant boredom. Luckily, GH has a significanthumor quotient which helps to balance out the way big boredom.The most disturbing thing about Ghost Adventures is that shows likethis tend to fuel the magical thinking beliefs of people who posseslimited critical thinking skills. Many of the positive reviews of thisshow seem to support that assertion. In and of itself, I don't reallycare if people believe in ghosts; the problem is, when people believetrue that for which there is no evidence, that belief can effect howthat person understands other facets of reality. E.g. If a personbelieves he knows the will of "The one true God," and based on thatbelief in god's will, he judges some group of non-believers to be evil(non-believer being any people who do not share his particular beliefof god's will), and if he also believes the one true god rewards hisservants who kill evil people in his name, that person might be willingto kill many people who "offend" his concept of god. I admit that is anextreme example, but it's an example that has happened time and timeagain throughout recorded history, and still happens way too often formy liking. I have no expectation that my words here will change the mind of anyghost or magic true believers who like this show. If on the other handa reader is curious about how we humans come to believe many of thethings we do, one might want to consider doing an Internet search forMichael Shermer. He has written several good books which explain ourcurrent scientific knowledge of the human mind's inner workings. Hewrites his books in such a way that those without significantscientific education can still readily understand the subject matter.One of his more recent books is "The Believing Brain" which can befound online and at many traditional book stores. It's a veryinteresting read, but I will warn you that after reading it, you mightbe inclined to reconsider some of you long and deeply held beliefs.Even if it doesn't cause you to reconsider your old beliefs, it mightstill help you in selecting which future beliefs you come to hold.I do not sell books, and I do not make money from the sale of any bookon the market today. I have, however, just finished reading "TheBelieving Brain" and thought the book applies well to this subject.

smjblessing

(2012-03-27 13:07:25)

Scary,Interesting and Raw.

Zak Baggans,Nick Groff, and Aaron Goodwin are out on a quest to catchproof of paranormal evidence by going to some of the most hauntedplaces across the world from country music bars to abandoned insaneasylums. They go in first to learn about the place then they the threeare locked down inside for an entire night trying to catch ghosts onvideo and on audio. This show is really scary and really gets you towonder about the after-life. Of course one cannot help being skepticalat points in the shows, however they still do hold a very convincingtone to it. I think it tops all of those other ghost shows. Especiallythe god-awful Ghost Hunters. I think that's what it's called, but it'sthe one where its the group one thousand British people and all it doesis bore you rather than scare you. Watch them jump at barely audiblenoises, such as creaky floor boards and other non-scary stuff. Somecriticism arrives from the show, but the evidence that tries to revealthem as fakes holds very weak and makes me want to see these skepticslocked down in a place ridden with demons. What gives Ghost Adventuresa good scary edge is the taunting of evil spirits that mainly ZalBaggans does. In one episode he is physically attacked!! That issomething that never happens on other ghost shows. Some deniers claimthat they are actors. Well just to be honest, Zak and Nick have triedto become actors, however, that's complete B.S to bring up against thembecause a lot of people do stuff like that to get noticed. Likereporters who do stuff on purpose to get noticed or movie stars sayingoutrageous crap to get put in the headlines (example: Owen Wilson'ssuicidal thoughts. Angelina Jolie trying to become a lesbian.I could goon, but I don't think I will !!). Also to clear stuff up,I can safelysay that these three kids aren't the only ones behind the show. I'mpretty sure there are people responsible for selecting the locations,writing the show's narration, and traveling with them. The three do goin for lock downs by themselves though. They also probably have somesort of creative direction behind the show. These guys can't run aTravel Channel show completely!! No one can for any show!! Even if itis reality. This show is really great and can be funny at timeslistening to their "Woah.... dude, bro" reactions as well as Zak'sdelightful personality. For instance when they are in the HoughtonMansion in the Masonic Temple part, Aaron bumps into this small altarand Zak jokes, "Woah, dude , that thing might have powers.." And thinkthat's okay, because that's where this show gets it's charm from.

Seb

(2012-03-19 17:57:40)

Dude! I think I just saw a dude over there...

In Ghost Dude Adventures a group of dudes set out to document evidenceof the supernatural by shouting at it. The locations they visit arequite interesting but the host is just an absolute tool and after awhile his constant shouting and repetition of the word 'dude' starts tograte.Most people watch these shows because they'd like to see some evidencebut you won't get any here. Their EVP's sound like nothing and arefrequently ruined by them shouting over everything.Their Halloween show was unbelievable. They were running around anasylum shouting abuse and "challenging the ghosts". Then you'd get asegment about how awfully these people were treated and how they diedin misery. Then back to the shouting. At one point they think they heara woman screaming, this is their reaction - word for word: "Dude! Iheard a woman screaming! High five, high five!"The live show also featured a 'ghost trap' (guess if it worked or not),that swinger looking couple that seem to pop up on every ghost show andbest of all a guy in a cowboy hat blatantly throwing something and thenpretending it had been snatched out of his hand. At least they had thegood sense to disown him on the next episode.Awful show. They should have called it Ghost Hunting on Steroids.

dorotka24

(2012-03-19 12:25:24)

Interesting, often terrifying

I had sampled a number of reality haunted location shows in the past,such as Britain's "Most Haunted," and found them generally unappealing.Several of late have been more interesting, and "Ghost Adventures" isone of them.The formula for each show is similar - a team of paranormalinvestigators spends time in a purportedly haunted location in thehopes of capturing evidence of activity, whether audio, video,personal, or other experiences. Much infrared and night vision camerawork ensues, with many dramatic moments and even a few expletives.Afterwards their footage is reviewed and replayed to note any unusualanomalies, like EVPs, "orbs," noises, or occasional visual phenomenaincluding apparitions.Since I have a great interest in history, the highlight of the show forme is the fact that the crew visits a wide variety of localesthroughout the United States that have long and storied pasts. Most ofthem are unknown to me, boosting my interest substantially. The hostdoes a fine job of providing background for the locale and the purposesof the many rooms or buildings within, not to mention possible reasonsfor the hauntings. Some of the locales are buildings which have beenlong abandoned, and are private property not opened to the public. Muchof the furniture, layout, and years of dust are preserved for all tosee.The supernatural phenomena captured by the crew is fascinating, andoften disturbing. The show relies on the trust and belief of the viewerto convey the fear and drama, and unfortunately much of what we seecould be explained or reproduced with special effects technology. Buteven if the supernatural phenomena could be explained away, there is acertain ambiance to large, spooky, and historic buildings that is initself fear inspiring.There are a few flaws that sometimes detract from the experience. Theinvestigators themselves do not carry themselves as professionals, andare apparently amateurs. Although they are brave to spend the night insuch places, the show oftentimes reminds me of a juvenile dare, asopposed to a serious investigation. The host can often be downrightobnoxious, and his antics sometimes cut into the atmosphere of thesurroundings. The focus for the crew is to create tension, and theyclearly inject drama in an attempt to make the show more interesting tothe audience. This is all right, but for me further reduces theircredibility as investigators.In the end, though, the show's strong points make up for its flaws inmy opinion. I will always try to catch it whenever possible, and findit to be generally fascinating and terrifying.

sabercatsfan

(2012-03-18 03:41:07)

Awful show

I personally don't care much for this show or how they do thereinvestigations, every show they claim they have evidence of paranormalactivity. Anyone with half of a brain knows that when we do theinvestigation's there are going to be plenty of times were we will comeup empty handed. I think (And I have had plenty of other people I knowthat feel the same) gives paranormal field a bad name. Zak (Leadinvestigator) Will be saying to the spirits "I'm not afraid of you!""Your a coward" and other things trying to get a reaction from thespirit, then every little sound he goes "Did you hear that?" Alsoanother thing don't like about this show- their EVP's suck, most of thetime you cant understand what its saying and then you have Zak sayingit's is saying "I hate Zak" or whatever. As said this show is acomplete joke. I'm sure there are gonna be a few Ghost Adventure fansthat will be offended by that and probably call me names- oh well! lol.If you want to see a real paranormal show then watch Ghost Hunters.

suessis

(2012-03-18 00:29:03)

I'm torn...

between wanting to laugh at and being seriously intrigued by this show.When these guys really get into this I feel like I'm watching Bill andTed's Excellent Ghost Hunting Adventure. "Dude! Dude! Did you hearthat? Whoa!". I think that a lot of what goes on here is them (inparticular Zac) reacting to their environment. Also the creativeediting that is done afterward emphasizes a great deal. Despite that,there are moments when I feel they are actually making contact with theother side. Since I can't be sure that anything is real here, I can only judge thison entertainment value. For that I can say it is truly entertaining.With the music, editing, and graphics used it's truly an awesome ridethrough the paranormal.

pezgirlie

(2012-03-11 03:42:43)

So fake

This show is so obviously faked. They tried to claim that a guy fromthe 1600s attacked them and then said "I just slapped you bitches."Yes, because men from the 1600s obviously talked like a modern day fratboy. Suuuure. Oh, and there was also the time they tried to claim thatthey caught ghosts having sex. Ghosts. Having sex. They also claim to get multiple EVPs and other evidence of theparanormal per hunt. Most ghost hunters never get anything when they gohunting. Watch this for the entertainment factor ("Dude!", "Dude?", "Dude."),but don't bother taking it seriously.

kssmyss

(2012-03-10 04:41:59)

Pros and Cons

My first reaction upon seeing the commercial for the series premiere onthe Travel Channel was: "Oh, great. Not another ghost-hunting show!"Initially, I thought, "Okay, there's a cocky buff guy (perhaps onsteroids) with a big ego who wants publicity and likes to show off hisbiceps." But after a while, I feel that the ghost-hunting trio is moreentertaining and more worthy of being nationally televised and watchedthan either British women screaming (Most Haunted) or another boringgroup barely getting anything (Ghost Hunters).Obviously, the primary reason we viewers watch these paranormalprograms is to see to believe. Having seen these shows as well asmaterial posted on the Internet, I believe that ghosts/spirits of thedead (and thus the afterlife) are plausible. I am agnostic about theexistence of the afterlife and ghosts. With that said, I am alsouncertain that any of the unexplainable phenomena the crew captured onvideo (including full-bodied apparitions, shadow people, mists, movingobjects, and physical harm and possessions) are actual. On average, Isee two (2) visual phenomena captured per episode/investigation. But asalways, it's up to us to decide. As for the shallow and narrow-mindedskeptics, especially those hardcore and lazy ones, I highly recommend(as any paranormal enthusiast would) that they spend hours atreportedly haunted local places and experience whatever happens forthemselves. A Gallup poll conducted in 2005 shows that 3/4 of Americansbelieve in something paranormal; whereas, 1/3 (32%) believe in theexistence of ghosts, and 37% in haunted properties.All in all, their investigations seem rather fruitful in pursuingvisual and auditory "evidence" to prove that ghosts, and thus theafterlife, exist (and that witnesses aren't crazy). Being apparentlyenthusiastic and emotional, the crew experiences and documents more(apparently real) incidents than TAPS from Ghost Hunters and any othercompeting show that I know of, which have faulty camera crews andall-too-brief vigils that last only a few hours. Despite TAPS's more"professional" approach, TAPS rarely receives any evidence and is tooboring to watch; whereas, GAC is much more entertaining and capturesthe most phenomena, spending an entire night (10±2 hours) at eachplace. Indeed, Ghost Adventures got so much stuff that anti-AdventuresHunters fans find their evidence hard to believe and suspect that it'sfake. Moreover, their televised 2006 documentary filmed in 2004 (duringtheir amateur days) has received several awards, including the 2006Grand Jury Prize for Best Documentary at the NYIIFVF. After the airingof the "walking apparition" and "flying brick" in the film, TAPS seemsto follow wherever GAC first went: the Old Washoe Club in VirginiaCity, NV and the Goldfield Hotel in Goldfield, NV. The trio may bescared more easily, but maybe fear increases paranormal activity.Having read feedback comments on various websites, including IMDb, Ifind that haters and hard-headed viewers are criticizing the show tooseriously. Ghost Adventures Live at the Trans-Allegheny Lunatic Asylumin Weston, West Virginia was the best live televised ghost hunt I'veever seen so far. For me, neither Most Haunted Live nor Ghost Hunters:Live Halloween Countdown even compare to GAL's higher level ofinteractivity. The trio has even publicly investigated some places withfans and enthusiasts alike. Those who seriously dislike this rarelyboring show really need to chill. They could have at least enjoyed(rather than overlook) the entertaining moments of spontaneous humor,such as their overreaction and three body types. Where else can you seea trio of buff, thin, and fat guys all in one show? The hatersshouldn't be taking it too seriously; there's no need to be allnegative. Geez, no sense of humor, which is very much needed.Sure, I do agree that ex-skeptic Zak (born 1977) can sometimes beannoying, irritating, obnoxious, overrated, cheesy, lame, egotistic,and verbally repetitive. Since he and Nick take part in the editing, heis responsible for making himself look that way. To me, the alpha maleis a better narrator than either a host or lead investigator. I thinkhe tries to act tough to make up for running from the brick in theGoldfield Hotel and from the Virginia City cemetery. But wouldn'tanyone be scared in a creepy, dark, haunted place? Zak was a DJ—maybethat explains his attitude. Is it just me, or is married Nick (born1980) getting mellower since Season 1? The youngest member, he seems tobe the coolest and most mature. And who cannot love that Aaron (born1976)? The oldest member, he's so cuddly, bubbly, and funny. Is it justme, or is he losing a little weight and fear? Who would ever forget hisfright face after hearing the EVP in the miners' cabin? I can't helpbut say to myself, "Poor Aaron!" He cracks me up every time.FYI: Throughout the series, Zak and Nick keep incorrectly saying"(electronic voice) phenomenons" instead of "phenomena." Also, Zak andAaron like to say "dude," and Aaron gasps with a laughable facialexpression and often shouts, "Whoa, my God!" LOL!So far to me, Ghost Adventures is the most artistic, entertaining, andfruitful ghost-hunting TV series. Destination Truth (2007–present) andGhost Adventures are my top two most entertaining paranormal TV shows.Scariest Places on Earth (2001–06) looks and sounds like the mostoriginal paranormal reality TV series. Overall, I give the show 8/10(4/5) stars.

Kupotek

(2012-03-10 09:40:40)

Ignorant as hell but entertaining as well

I think that sums it up, much of Zak's theories are really silly.Physical sensations as evidence are easily recreatable psychosomaticsymptoms easily recreatable and intensified by the sensory confusion ofdarkness, also when Zak mentions that the fire in Virginia Citydestroyed the tombstones so the dead had no name which would make themnot at rest, that's quite possibly the stupidest thing he's ever said.Why? Because when you're dead, you give up your name, your name is notyou, you return to you in your purest form, your name getting erased bya fire in the physical world would have absolutely no effect on you asa spirit.Again, I love the show, but Zak is ignorant, I mean we all are to someextent, but man he's funny... I love the show but you really have gotto take what is said with a grain of salt because they mostly don'tknow what the hell the're talking about.Most haunting experiences tend to happen in the day, but they do theirlockdowns in darkness which serves no purpose other than to confuse thesenses, create false positives, I wonder if they really believe whatthey're saying, or if they really understand how silly they sound? Ilove how open minded Zak comes off on the show, but he also comes offas ignorant because he doesn't really have a scientific mind toquestion his own theories or test them.

phrixion

(2012-03-09 19:47:22)

Original documentary was watchable... TV show gets tedious...

The original documentary Ghost Adventures is much more entertaining andmore interesting than the TV series on the Travel Channel. The TV showis tedious, overly dramatic and difficult to follow through the wholehour. Because this a documentary follows more of the documentary makersmore than the subject matter is not good. The guys involved are toomelodramatic for anyone to take this show with serious consideration asa level of entertainment or even want to believe what they are doing isvalid. The investigative concept is the right one to take, but not inthe direction they are taking it. It's like Most Haunted, but at leaston that show they are honestly fake right up front.