torpeau

(2012-04-24 22:31:29)

We've seen worse. Much worse!

A dumb movie, but it was not offensive and somewhat entertaining.It did run a little long and, parts of it were far out.Katherine Heigl is really nice to look at.

Jen Yamato

(2012-04-24 13:33:55)

Kutcher and Heigl have such forced chemistry that it's hard to believe they'd ever fall in love, much less stay married in blissful blah-dom.

(2012-04-22 14:10:33)

MY MOM MADE ME WATCH THIS

My grandmother came over and my mom showed up with this movie, I had a feeling that this movie would be horrible and it was. All I can say is I was utterly disappointed(ROFL:D I just said utterly!!!)I don't see how anyone could think this film was good.I did learn something from this movie though: filmmakers must believe you can make more money with a flop than a hit.

(2012-04-22 00:41:38)

killers movie

This review is from: Killers (DVD) it is a great movie. the two main charters have great chemistry together and are very funny.I love kathryn Heigel.

msklobro

(2012-04-12 18:15:23)

Lacking Chemistry

The most noticeable problem with this film was the lack of chemistrybetween Kutcher and Heigl. I watched the movie twice just to make sureI wasn't missing something. Of course, the director/writers could havedeveloped the relationship further and it might have helped.I did think that Catherine O'Hara was the funniest part of the film. Iwas ready for a drink myself when the film was over...It seemed very much like Katherine Heigl was trying to carry the comedyin the film while Kutcher just stumbled along. The two weren'tbelievable as a couple or as action figures and I think the film missedthe mark completely... I think that it definitely had potential, butsomewhere it got off track and let the audience down...

(2012-04-12 04:02:15)

Katherine Heigl sucks!

An awful film with 2 awful leads. Katherine Heigl is especially stinky in this movie. Her acting is tough to watch. I hope this chicks 15 minutes are finally upKatherine Heigl is unctuous.

Brandon Blackwell

(2012-04-10 15:05:03)

"Marriage... give it your best shot"

A vacationing woman meets her ideal man, leading to a swift marriage.Back at home, however, their idyllic life is upset when they discovertheir neighbors could be assassins who have been contracted to kill thecouple.Have you ever been so bored, you force yourself to see something youreally have no interest to see? In the meantime, you realize what yourwatching and suddenly came to the horrible truth, this is a really badfilm and nothing could save it. Your entertained easily, and thestupidity is transformed into cinematic genius. But after the film, youwake up from your happy-go-lucky dream and realize the real truth, thatwas one of the worst movies you've ever seen. 1/10.

(2012-04-10 00:01:16)

Secrets of a Married Man...

2010's romantic comedy "Killers" features Katherine Heigl as Jen Kornfeldt, recovering from a failed relationship by joining her overprotective parents (a well-cast Tom Selleck and Catherine O'Hara) on a vacation to the French Riviera. On an elevator ride in the hotel, Jen meets a handsome young man, who after some nicely awkward banter, introduces himself as Spencer Aimes, traveling consultant. In fact, Spencer is a secret agent, whose job is to terminate bad guys. Spencer falls for the open and honest Jen, and leaves his unnamed agency to be with her. As Spencer's handler warns him at their last meeting, you don't just walk away from the secret agent business. Flash forward three years, to a married Jen and Spencer, juggling various committments, and Spencer's birthday party, in a nice, safe suburban neighborhood. Spencer's secret past suddenly catches up with him. The properly paranoid Spencer fears danger around every corner, and finds he has a lot of explaining to do, as he and Jen go on the run."Killers" plays out as an interesting combination of romantic comedy and action thriller, verging at times on broad farce. Threats come from the most unlikely directions, while Jen and Spencer debate the strained status of their marriage. Katherine Heigl and Ashton Kutcher are an attractive combination, nicely balanced against the hilarious couple portrayed by Tom Selleck and Catherine O'Hara. "Killers" is highly recommended, despite its title, as good light fun.

Amber Wilkinson

(2012-04-04 22:59:07)

Everything has a thrown-together feel, as the characters are tossed from romcom situations to action set-pieces and back again with no thought to applying any sort of grace notes to ease the transition.

(2012-04-04 03:56:41)

horrible bag o crap

This movie was one of the worst films I have ever seen. If you feel compelled to watch it, pay the dollar at redbox. You will regret it.... you have been warned.

(2012-03-27 15:38:34)

Killers 2010

This review is from: Killers (DVD) It starts out kinda slow but picks up after 45 min., good movie but I think it was trying to hard to be like "Fun With Dick And Jane".

DarkVulcan29

(2012-03-27 02:09:50)

Mad About You meets The Bourne Identity

Our story begins with Jen(Katherine Heigl) travels to France with herparents(Tom Selleck and Catherine O'Hara) after recovering from abitter breakup. When she first gets there, she meets Spencer(AshtonKutcher), a handsome charming man, both instantly become smitten witheach other, fall in love and get married. Three years later they seemedto be settled in.Until someone has put a hit on Spencers life, Spencer didn't tell Jenabout his past, he was a C.I.A. assassin, until he met Jen, and quicklyrealized he wants out, and wants a normal life. With people trying tokill them left and right, and not knowing who to trust, will theysurvive and will there marriage too? Ashton Kutcher trying to do James Bond, and he does okay. KatherineHeigl is alright, but she wore out after a while. Tom Selleck andCatherine O' Hara are amusing. The action are fun, kind of like TheBourne Identity. It blend comedy, suspense, and action so perfectlywell together. Now my complaint is that there is a twist at the end,when you learned who ordered the hit, I won't say what it is, butruined the point of everything else for me. It served no purpose. Butthe rest of the film was entertaining.

broadwaybound1991

(2012-03-18 16:19:54)

A Winning Combination

I thought this movie was a fantastic, upbeat, lively, and quitehumorous way to present an action/romance film. It was the most perfectcombination of Action-related fight sequences and explosions andRomantic-related love interests and cuteness. My initial thought was,"Oh my gosh who directed this? It was amazing!"then I just assumed that there had to be two directors (one who wasprimarily action-focused and another romance) because that was too goodfor one person! The script had a few cheesy parts (like all romantic comedies do) butother than that I thought the writers were right on. I would have to compare it to one of Katherine Heigle's best romanticcomedies combined with Mr. and Mrs. Smith (But done better, funnier,less intense, less stupid, and more interesting). It was the first well-done action/romantic-comedy in a long time and itwill probably stay that way for a long time.

Prairie Miller

(2012-03-18 10:07:24)

A boobs 'n biceps fluffy espionage burb romance, helped in no small part by a host of unlikely everyday unneighborly assassins. Though a homicidal Kutcher, recently caught with his pants down as a conniving baby-faced gigolo in Spread, is another matter.

(2012-03-17 08:34:21)

Perfect title, this movie was a Killer

I have to say that when I first heard about this movie I thought that it had entertaining prospects. Boy was I wrong. It felt like a low budget party with all Ashton Kutcher's actor and comedy friends. Something of an impromptu skit with no production value whatsoever. The cast was miscast and the majority of actors just muddled through their terrible lines and select acting parts. Even the car chase scenes were lame, who can mess up a car chase now days? I found myself wishing they would catch and kill Ashton's charater and put him out of his misery. How can they produce such dribble? I throught that movie was a contest for who could perform the worst, and there were many in this movie that meet that bar. What was the deal with Catherine O'Hara? She could have gargled her lines with all the alcohol they were dumping down her. This movie was major tripe, so save your money for a better movie.

jimojimo

(2012-03-16 23:12:14)

Stupid. Just stupid.

This movie was so over-the-top stupid that it went beyond "hey, it'sover- the-top but let's just go with it and have fun". No. Let's not.It was just stupid. Boring, stupid, senseless. OK, I'm obliged to give a general description of the movie, so here itis: Stupid.Don't waste your time. Let me take the bullet for you--don't see this.My wife wanted to see it and I suffered through it trying to be thegood husband. At the end she had admitted it was stupid too. I reallycan't say anything more about it. Just stupid. I want my 2 hours back.

hfeldst

(2012-03-10 22:42:10)

SOMEONE EXECUTE KILLERS

About what you'd expect from a bunch of TV stars playing movie stars. "Killers" takes an retread storyline, mixes it with Ashton Kutcher, Katherine Heigl, Tom Selleck and Catherine O'Hara. It promises action, laughs and romance. All it delivers is an annoying Ms. Heigl, a bland Mr. Kutcher, Mr. Selleck's famous moustache (pointed out repeatedly in case you miss it), and Ms. O'Hara playing drunk for cheap laughs. Spencer (Mr. Kutcher) and Jen (Ms. Heigl) meet "cute", marry and three years later live a dull life in the suburbs, when to her surprise, Jen discovers her husband is a CIA agent and people are suddenly trying to kill them. Mr. Selleck and Ms. O'Hara play Jen's parents who, under normal circumstances wouldn't have very much screen time but hang around enough for you to realize they are important to what passes for the plot.You seen this before in "True Lies" or more recently "Mr. & Mrs. Smith". There is so much illogic in this film, 30 seconds can't cover all my questions. If you find the two young leads appealing, you probably won't be disappointed. If you care about acting and a good script, prepare to be let down.

MM

(2012-03-10 12:13:01)

Just Saw It

Since I haven't seen much of what Ashton has done since he married Demi and started his own production empire I was ok with his performance. I think the twist was Tom Selleck (won't give it away). The mother was a bit over the top, but she had cause to be. Kathryn did a pretty good job but I don't think many women could have stayed in that situation. Overall enjoyable, but definetly not a comedy.

Zeemanta

(2012-03-08 04:36:30)

Punk'd out of $11

What can you say about a guy who can't act his way out of a plastic bag, and a woman who's universally hated by every cast she's ever worked with? I know: they suck. And so did this movie. I liked it better the first time when it had real actors (Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie), and a real plot.This is a complete waste of time.

Simon Reynolds

(2012-03-07 23:36:35)

It's better than The Bounty Hunter, with the two leads making a more charming couple than Jennifer Aniston and Gerard Butler, but it's still difficult to view Killers as anything more than throwaway fluff.